The
question of who a Primary or Secondary
target of a market continues to provoke raving debates in conference rooms of
many advertising and marketing agencies. The seemingly lack of consensus on target
audience categorization usually stalls many meeting, rendering people
confrontational in their submissions on the subject.
Critical as target
audience categorization is to effective planning, prioritizing and decision
making, not having a clear criteria for the categorization is disheartening and
inimical to making resource –effective decisions.
It is
in the light of the above observations that I want to lend my intellectual
support to the concept of target audience categorization. In doing this, I will
draw heavily from the observations I personally made while devising strategies
for my school assignments and project
work.
As an
intellectual, I am open to criticism as I am not the repository of all
knowledge and experiences. I will therefore be appreciative of constructive feedback that will stimulate the debate, intellectually.
Having
clearly articulated my intentions for this piece, I think I will at this
juncture proceed with my discussion on the subject of who primary target or
secondary targets are.
What is the criteria?
A clearly defined set of criterion is an
effective way of averting the debates that usually characterize the audience
target categorization. The writer submits that if an Agency can agree on the
appropriate yardsticks or parameters for classification, the needless debate on
the subject will be reduced to the barest minimum.
While I
accept that the appropriateness or otherwise of criteria for this purpose is
discretionary, and experiential, I am still inclined to entertain the idea that
Agency’s or Marketing Teams should move to
reaching consensus on the appropriate criteria for the categorization.
CRITERIA :( FACTORS THAT SHOULD
INFORM THE CATEGORIZATION)
- The Level of Consumer’s Dependence on the Brand
The
degree to which the brand is relevant or necessary for meeting consumer’s needs
is one of the criteria for differentiating between Primary and Secondary Targets.
By reference to needs, I allude to Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs theory.
If one were to depend on a brand in order to fulfill a need then such an individual assumes a primary target status.
Individuals
who may not have a direct utility for the brand will invariably become the
Secondary target. They are equally key because though they may not be directly
be dependent on the brand they are key influencers and are relied upon to give
feedback that can either make or break consumer’s loyalty for a particular brand
within a product category.
For
instance, a lady who relies on a particular brand of foot aware
for the purposes of expressing her fashion sense, though a Primary target of
any campaign initiated by that brand, the feedback she gets from friends, and
other influencing parties(Secondary Targets) becomes reference point for
validating her decision to associate with that brand. Where the feedback does
not reinforce or validate her decision for choosing such a brand, the
possibility of varying her preference for that brand will be high.
This
goes to lend credence to the need for both the Primary and Secondary target to
be favorably disposed towards your brand. While limited budget will not make it
possible for both parties to be prioritized in every campaign, factoring the
Secondary target’s communications needs and expectations is key for success.
2.Whose attitude, belief and Perception when
influenced, can inure beneficially to
our Communication/Marketing objectives:
I am
conscious of the difficulty and the impossibility of changing human attitudes,
beliefs and perceptions. As Communication Strategist, I don’t believe we have
the spiritual capacity to exorcise or deliver people from an attitude which is
not favorable to the brand we are promoting. Our weapon is the tool of
communication which we can use to shape and influence people’s attitude in a
manner that they will make them act without noting a change in their own
attitude. This is why I prefer to use ‘Influence and not change.
Now back to my argument.
Usually,
Primary targets are the people whose attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, when
shaped or influenced can inure to your Marketing or Communication goals,
beneficially. This, however, is not to suggest that paying attention to a
secondary target will be counter-productive. Although, influencing the Secondary
targets will not be directly beneficial to meeting your marketing goals,
cultivating them will be important key as they are key in validating the
decisions that the Primary target makes.
3. 3. WHO A CONSUMER IS AND WHO A CUSTOMER IS
Closely
related to the above is the need for the Strategist to strike a balance between
who a consumer is and who a customer also is. This is because, sometimes, not
all consumers may be customers and not all customers may be consumers. These
two are not mutually exclusive though.
A man
in our traditional Ghanaian setting will be a consumer of certain brand of
Tomato Paste and will not even know what brand it is, talk less of where it was
purchased. In this case the Primary target will be the House wife (Feminists
like Judy Brady should spare me on this).This is because they make the
purchasing decision. In other words they are the customers (Their consumer
status is still valid, though.)
While
the man may not be a customer the fact that he can influence the purchasing
decision through his comments and feedback on food Prepared with that Tomato
paste brand makes him an interested party in this adventure.
All
things being unequal, if the man expresses some reservations with the way food
prepared with that Tomato Past brand tastes, the woman may vary her decision
for another brand. Again, where the price proves too injurious to the
disposable incomes of the man, he may lobby for a change in that particular
brand, if it is expensive (Don’t wink I have seen my father lobby in the
Kitchen before).
In all of these lobbying, the Communication
Strategist is minded to take into account these two differing interests,
ensuring that each on the party’s stake is fairly and evenly protected. For
instance, while the customer must be concerned about the quality or the brand
promise, the interest of the customer in this transaction should be how much a
particular brand within that product category affect their disposable incomes.
While
an emotionally driven strategy may keep the customer loyal to the brand, the consumer
who commits financially to the purchasing process need reasons to keep them
even if price gnaw at their income.
In the
nutshell, I want to believe that this piece has not exhasted all the possible and reasonable criteria that is key in differentiating between Primary and Secondary target. I will therefore count on your feedback to
get this conversation going.
Samuel
Osarfo Boateng
samuelcreasta@gmail.com
233541842198.
samuelcreasta@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment